From kragen@dnaco.net Fri Jul 31 11:56:30 1998
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1998 11:56:29 -0400 (EDT)
From: Kragen <kragen@dnaco.net>
To: fractint@lists.xmission.com
cc: GregJ56590@aol.com
Subject: Re: (fractint) Heightfields
In-Reply-To: <60dbcc90.35c0f274@aol.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.96.980731114707.21649k-100000@picard.dnaco.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 922
Status: O
X-Status: 

On Thu, 30 Jul 1998 GregJ56590@aol.com wrote:
> How does one create heightfields for ray-tracers like POV-Ray using Fractint?
> 
> I only seem to be able to make images with 256 colors. When I open these
> images in a paint program, the histogram of their color distribution shows
> that they are not a continuous distribution. 

256 colors is probably good enough most of the time.  But the default
settings yield a very steep slope away from, say, the Mandelbrot lake.

> I've seen some web references to people using Fractint to make heightfields
> for POV-Ray.  

Try some of the following:
- Use the distance estimation method.
- Set your bailout value to something enormous.
- Use a outside-coloring method other than the iteration number at bailout,
	which is the default.  (256-way decomposition is pretty cool.  The
	surfaces it yields are very discontinuous, which may not be what you
	want.)
- Make sure maxiter is at least 255 if you're coloring according to the
	default method.  (More than 255 might produce wraparound near the
	lake, where you follow a gradual slope upward to 255, then 
	precipitously drop down to 0, then go up again to the lake.)
- Use a different inside-coloring option.
- Use a hicolor or truecolor video mode so you can have more than 256 
	levels.  (They'll look better as heightfields than on the screen,
	I think.)

> Some of you on the list may remember that a few months ago, I
> complained about the difficulty (impossibility) of getting true RGB, or even
> true 256 Gray images out of Fractint.  

Why can't you get 256-gray images?

> The fact that people are using Fractint
> to make heightfields makes me wonder if I did not ask the correct question. 

I'm puzzled.

> Perhaps I am so dense as to need to be shown the exact keystrokes. 

Maybe so, or maybe not.  Do my suggestions make sense?

Kragen (it's been years since I did heightfields with fractint, so I 
	may be spouting nonsense)


